Book to Film: The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey

hobbit3This past weekend I saw Peter Jackson’s The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey, part one of a planned three-part adaptation of J.R.R. Tolkien’s Lord of the Rings prequel The Hobbit. I went with two other people. I loved the film. My father thought it was an hour too long. And our third companion thought it was “entertaining but not great.” Those three reactions sum up the critical response to the film, which unlike the award-winning Return of the King has been getting decidedly mixed reviews.

When I first heard Peter Jackson was adapting Tolkien’s 200+ page book into not one, not two, but three movies I was  a little surprised. Unlike the Lord of the Rings trilogy, which naturally lent itself to three films, this book didn’t seem to have the source material to last for three films, especially when I learned that An Unexpected Journey was over 2.5 hours long! And yet, as previously mentioned, I adored the movie. I am forever a fantasy junkie, and the care and sense of wonder that Peter Jackson infused LOTR with is definitely present in this film as well.

This adaptation of The Hobbit stands out to me as an outlier of book-to-film transitions, in that it almost exactly duplicates the first six chapters of the novel. In some cases, whole chunks of dialog and songs are reproduced in hobbit2their entirety, and Peter Jackson went so far as to have the dwarves arrive in the same order that they do in the book, with the same greetings and the same reactions by Bilbo Baggins to each arrival. The attention to detail is intense. And truly, enough happens in the first six chapters of the book to warrant a whole film. Bilbo is unwillingly drafted into an adventure by Gandalf, meets a party of dwarves on a mission to reclaim their homeland, visits with elves, fights goblins, and has a riddling contest with Gollum, deep in a cave under the mountain. To trim the run time (169 minutes is a loooong time) the film could have left out one or both of the dwarf songs in the first part of the story. They did stop the forward action of the plot. Otherwise, I have been converted – I think three movies makes perfect sense.

The cast is uniformlyhobbit1 excellent. Martin Freeman is the perfect combination of hesitant and bold, and brings a real spark to the character. He has been a favorite of mine since the BBC version of The Office, so it’s wonderful to see him on the big screen. Richard Armitage, another BBC favorite of mine (North & South), gives a stirring turn as the dwarf-prince Thorin. And all your favorite characters from the original trilogy – Gandalf, Elrond, and Galadriel – are present and accounted for. Even Frodo makes an appearance!

For fans of the original book, for children who missed out on the previous film trilogy (which are almost a decade old), and for those who are simply curious, I highly recommend this adaptation.

 

 

This entry was posted in Blogger Elisabeth Gattullo Marrocolla, Books, Children's Literature (all forms), Evaluation of Media. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Book to Film: The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey

  1. Jason Amato says:

    I agree with several of your points, and saw some pieces which could have been slightly shorter. However, I too am a huge fantasy buff and a fan of fantastic story telling. Some people believe story telling is the art of getting to the point, while others (and I) believe it is the art of making someone drool for the point. This film does just that. It takes it’s time and presents each event as its own fun and amazing adventure while keeping you waiting for more information on the central point. I say Kudos! I look forward to future releases!

  2. Michael Taylor says:

    Interesting perspective on the film. You actually read the book and contend the first six chapters are duplicated? Where in those six chapters was Thorin a glorified warrior? You did not observe that he was recreated as a youthful hero instead of the grumpy old man that Tolkien painted? Although I generally liked the film, the rewritten “fir trees” scene, far more violent than the text, and having Azog there was not needed. I wonder how many more liberties Jackson will take with the text and characterization. The positive here is that there is great fodder for comparison and contrast essays in English classes for individuals who complete a close reading of the novel.

    • Elisabeth Gattullo says:

      Hi Michael! Thank you for your comment! I have read the Hobbit many times, the first being when I was just starting middle school and the most recent being right after I saw this film. Because I watched the film before I re-read the book, I was even more struck by the duplication I mentioned, especially in the very beginning of the movie, with the arrival of the dwarves. I did say “almost exactly” because I was aware that there were differences. Since I try to keep my reviews under 500 words and I felt this movie was unique in its adherence to at least the spirit and often the letter of the text, I made the decision not to include them. :)

      Finally, I didn’t think they made Thorin that much younger – he had grey in his beard and hair and had clearly lived a very long time, as he was a youth in the prologue.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>